Joshen Lim 4c70efb562 RLS Tester to include policies that are applied to public (#45574) ...

## Context

For a table that has RLS enabled, but a policy with just `true` for the
role `public`
The RLS tester was incorrectly reporting that `anon` doesn't have access

Was happening as we weren't considering policies that apply to the
`public` role (which applies to _all_ roles)

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* RLS tester now treats explicitly-public policies as applicable
regardless of the impersonated role, improving policy coverage accuracy.
* **Refactor**
* Consolidated RLS test state computation to improve consistency of
access badges and policy messaging.
* **Tests**
* Added comprehensive tests validating RLS scenarios, badge states, and
policy/role messaging.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

2026-05-05 17:02:41 +08:00

..

__tests__

…

InferredSQLViewer.tsx

…

RLSTableCard.tsx

…

RLSTester.types.ts

…

RLSTesterEmptyState.tsx

…

RLSTesterResults.tsx

…

RLSTesterResults.utils.ts

…

RLSTesterSheet.tsx

…

RoleSelector.tsx

…

UserSelector.tsx

…

UserSqlEditor.tsx

…

useTestQueryRLS.ts

…