Files
Charis 4dee589735 fix(studio): stop assistant fabricating database_identifier for notebooks (#49558)
## Summary

* Fixes
[FE-4275](https://linear.app/supabase/issue/FE-4275/assistant-always-creates-notebooks-with-wrong-identifier-first-try):
the assistant always created database notebook cells with a fabricated
`database_identifier` (`"primary"`, later observed as `""` /
`"_primary"` under different prompt wording) instead of omitting the key
for the project's primary database, which tripped the tool's
reject-and-retry validation on the very first attempt.
* Prompt wording alone wasn't reliable — live eval runs against the real
model kept substituting a new placeholder every time the prompt was
tightened further.
* Normalizes an empty-string `database_identifier` to absent at the
schema level (`databaseIdentifierSchema` in `notebook-schema.ts`), which
is inherited by every schema built from it — the AI SDK's `inputSchema`
for `create_notebook`/`update_notebook`, and the write-boundary
`writableNotebookSchema` used right before the PUT to the backend.
* Adds an eval case (`evals/dataset.ts`) reproducing the original bug,
plus unit tests covering schema-level and write-boundary normalization.

## Test plan

- [X] `pnpm --filter studio exec tsc --noEmit` passes
- [X] `pnpm exec prettier --check` passes on touched files
- [X] Unit tests pass: `notebook-schema.test.ts`,
`notebook-upsert-mutation.test.ts`, `notebook-tools.test.ts` (104 tests)
- [X] Ran the new eval case against the real model 3x before the code
fix (0% correctness, fabricated `""`/`"_primary"`) and 3x after (100%
correctness)

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Improved notebook handling of empty database identifiers by treating
them as absent.
  * Ensured notebook requests omit unused database identifier fields.
  * Added validation guidance for read-replica database identifiers.
2026-08-25 15:08:28 -04:00
..

Studio Assistant Evals

We use Braintrust to evaluate Assistant behaviors against a tracked dataset (offline evals) and against live traces (online evals).

Offline Evals

Add offline eval test cases to dataset.ts. If needed, add new scorers (see below) for the specific dimension you wish to test. Expect to update and run offline evals when adding new Assistant behaviors

You may wish to run offline evals when:

  • You updated the eval suite with a new test case or scorer
  • You changed Assistant's behavior and want to check for improvements/regressions

Running Offline Evals in CI

Add the run-evals label on a PR to the repo and Braintrust's GitHub Action will run evals and post a summary comment (example).

You can find detailed results in the "Experiments" tab of the "Assistant" project on Braintrust.

Running Offline Evals in Local Dev

Within apps/studio

# To set up WASM files
pnpm evals:setup

# Run all evals and upload results to Braintrust
pnpm evals:upload

# Run all evals without uploading results
pnpm evals:run

# Run an upload single test case
pnpm braintrust eval evals/assistant.eval.ts --filter "input.prompt=How many projects"

Upload results when you want to inspect Experiments or Logs in the Braintrust dashboard or API. You can use developer tools like Braintrust MCP or bt CLI to analyze results with an agent.

Scorers

Scorers look at a thread or task output and assign a score deterministically or via LLM-as-a-judge. Optionally they can consider expected values.

Define scorers in scorer.ts and include them in assistant.eval.ts to run them in offline evals.

Updating Online Scorers

Online scorers run as serverless functions on Braintrust infrastructure. They're deployed from the scorer-online.ts script. Since these scoring against production traces, they can't rely on ground truth expected values. Structure scoring logic and LLM prompts accordingly. Not every scorer needs to be an online scorer.

To opt-in to online scoring, add the scorer to scorer-online-manifest.json and add a corresponding handler in scorer-online.ts

Testing & Deploying Online Scorers

Add the preview-scorers label to a PR to deploy branch-prefixed scorers to the "Assistant (Staging Scorers)" Braintrust project (example). From that project dashboard, you can manually test the scorer against a trace from any project.

After merge to master, preview scorers automatically clean up and deploy to the production in the "Assistant" Braintrust project. Update the "Online Scoring" automation in the Logs page to include the new scorer function.