Files
linshen 2cdd095c2b docs(workspace): consolidate compare evaluation specs and acceptance evidence
- fold earlier planning notes into a single current-spec and archived history structure
- keep manual acceptance steps and real API samples aligned with the refactored analysis/result/compare model
- retain supporting workspace notes needed to review version-selection and evaluation behavior changes
2026-03-18 09:35:44 +08:00

21 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

```json
{
"score": {
"overall": 78,
"dimensions": [
{ "key": "goalAchievementRobustness", "label": "目标达成稳定性", "score": 70 },
{ "key": "outputQualityCeiling", "label": "输出质量上限", "score": 90 },
{ "key": "promptPatternQuality", "label": "提示词模式质量", "score": 65 },
{ "key": "crossSnapshotRobustness", "label": "跨快照鲁棒性", "score": 60 },
{ "key": "workspaceTransferability", "label": "对工作区的可迁移性", "score": 85 }
]
},
"improvements": [
"在原始提示词中补充明确的任务类型(如七言律诗)、表达方式要求(含蓄、不解释)和意象范围,可以显著提升模型输出的质量与一致性。",
"为提高跨快照鲁棒性,建议在提示词中加入格式规范(如八句四联、押平声韵),以减少模型因理解偏差导致的输出不稳定。",
"在需要控制输出风格时,应避免模糊指令(如“写一首诗”),而应使用更具体的任务描述,引导模型聚焦于特定文学形式或情感表达。"
],
"summary": "快照 B 的输出质量更高,主要得益于其明确了任务类型、格式约束及禁止项,这些差异直接影响了生成结果的文学性和一致性。"
}
```