From 611d65eacccbd6118bd6d35184ec88b611296e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TooYoungTooSimp <6648049+TooYoungTooSimp@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:28:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Improve reasoning content handling in response logic

Enhance reasoning content retrieval by falling back to 'reasoning' if 'reasoning_content' is absent or empty.
In some selfhosted openai-like server serving deepseek, the response.delta may contains reasoning rather than reasoning_content. So the client like codex does not recognize the thinking process.
---
 .../openai/responses/openai_openai-responses_response.go    | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/internal/translator/openai/openai/responses/openai_openai-responses_response.go b/internal/translator/openai/openai/responses/openai_openai-responses_response.go
index d471683af..6f9e2a5e0 100644
--- a/internal/translator/openai/openai/responses/openai_openai-responses_response.go
+++ b/internal/translator/openai/openai/responses/openai_openai-responses_response.go
@@ -398,7 +398,11 @@ func ConvertOpenAIChatCompletionsResponseToOpenAIResponses(ctx context.Context,
 				}
 
 				// reasoning_content (OpenAI reasoning incremental text)
-				if rc := delta.Get("reasoning_content"); rc.Exists() && rc.String() != "" {
+				rc := delta.Get("reasoning_content")
+				if !rc.Exists() || rc.String() == "" {
+					rc = delta.Get("reasoning")
+				}
+				if rc.Exists() && rc.String() != "" {
 					// On first appearance, add reasoning item and part
 					if st.ReasoningID == "" {
 						st.ReasoningID = fmt.Sprintf("rs_%s_%d", st.ResponseID, idx)